TFPA: Tasmanian Freight Equalisation Scheme needs a ground-up review

TFPA: Tasmanian Freight Equalisation Scheme needs a ground-up review

Posted 21 November 2024

Economic benefits and markets


Media Release: Tasmanian Forest Products Association. A scheme to help alleviate the burden of sea freight for Tasmanian businesses should have a
ground-up review and be indexed, according to the Tasmanian Forest Products Association (TFPA).

Meeting in Hobart on 13 November 2024, the Senate Select Committee on the Tasmanian Freight Equalisation Scheme (TFES) was told the scheme is out-of-date, in need of administrative changes and should be indexed to ensure it remains fit for purpose.

The TFES assists Tasmanian businesses to be more competitive when exporting goods to the mainland, by offsetting the costs of shipping across Bass Strait.

Speaking to the inquiry, TFPA Chief Executive Officer, Nick Steel, said the scheme was essential to keep all exporting Tasmanian businesses competitive.

“A recent survey of our members found that the majority of them use the scheme in one way or another - whether that’s for processed timber, trusses, veneer, engineered wood products or sustainably harvested logs.

“With over $320 million in exports to the mainland, and over $55 million in international trade facilitated through the system it’s essential for our industry,” Mr Steel said.

“These figures are only for the sustainable forest industry. The scheme is essential for all businesses that ship across Bass Strait.”

Mr Steel said there are several issues with the TFES as it currently operates. “Our members have told us the system is old, out-of-date, and relies on manual bookkeeping

methods. They say its lack of indexation actually means businesses are worse off now than before the scheme was introduced.

“And they say the scheme hasn’t kept up with increasing shipping costs - which are now much more per kilometre, per kilogram than road or rail freight – further disadvantaging Tasmanian businesses against their mainland counterparts."

Mr Steel said it’s important to note that the scheme’s objective was always to “alleviate”, but not fully “equalise” the freight cost disadvantage incurred by Tasmanian businesses who move freight between Tasmania and the mainland by sea.

“Shipping goods to and from Tasmania has a unique set of challenges, both logistically and economically,” Mr Steel said.

“The need to transfer goods from road or rail to ship and then back to road or rail is an impediment to trade no other state is faced with. This disadvantage was one of the reasons for TFES was originally introduced.

“Despite extensive shipping cost rises over recent years, the scheme has not been indexed against the rise in shipping costs, which has resulted in a perverse outcome where mainland businesses trade is at a distinct advantage over TFES supported Tasmanian businesses – exactly the purpose of the scheme’s original introduction.”

As well as hearing from the TFPA, the committee heard from a range of industry bodies, including Fruit Growers Tasmania, Wine Tasmania, the Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (TCCI) and TFPA member Norske Skog Boyer.

Media contact: David Bauche, Media and Public Relations Manager, 0491 205 627, david.bauche@tfpa.com.au